Episode 3: saw the recorded version late last night. Highlight key issues in non-selectives which even don't have to be in few selective areas in the country.

I felt sorry for the girls at Erith who really wanted to do well but they didn’t do as well as they could have. Although it wasn’t clear whether they would have struggled if they’d gone to Townley. The girl from Townley who was struggling did well in the end but she seems to have low self confidence and I felt bad for her because her mum was telling her to do maths a-level when she was clearly finding GCSE maths hard.

So i wasn't the only one who noticed this then! if you watched last night's episode, you would have seen a different side to the very same staff member. She was very accommodating and helpful to the young guy who was a under performing and clearly not bothered by his education or the assistance that was being offered. The girl from episode 2 was no angel but the teacher clearly had a problem with her. It is very uncomfortable to point out racial bias but this was very obvious and hard to ignore.

I did wonder whether that was because the girl was being rude to the staff but the boy wasn’t actually being agressive just non-caring.

In Episode 2 it was wrong for the teacher to come into the room and start shouting at Chichi when the other teacher was handling it fine.

But we don’t know what the background has been so it’s difficult to know just from watching clips.

And of course editing plays an important part. The programme makers need to some conflict.

It's uncomfortable and as a person of colour myself, I try not to see such things in that light. Sure Chichi isn't the easiest of children but how many are at that age? But it was very tangible.
Sadly in my working life I've encountered such attitudes from bosses and management who display a totally different attitude when dealing with people from BME communities then try and portray them as, " having an attitude problem."

Context doesn't excuse the approach of the staff member.

Absolutely agree - watched this with DD (11yo) and she said "why did the teacher say let's sit down and talk about this and then the other teacher come in and tell her off when she wasn't part of the conversation?" To then send her off site when she was acting up (fairly mildly in my opinion) as she was stressed about missing the revision session for a detention was unfair. The whole attitude to that poor girl was awful - background context was irrelevant to that situation. Haven't seen the latest episode so won't opine on whether it's unconscious (or conscious) bias due to stereotyping but I really felt that she needed a strong mentor / role model to help her move forward.

I know. I did think it was unfair what the teacher did but sometimes these programs use clever editing to make things look completely different from what actually happened.

Yes editing is a factor but we all saw what we saw. Anyone who has been at the receiving of such treatment will be used to people who will find any excuse to justify the behavior rather than admit the obvious. This time lets go with editing, shall we