Go to navigation
It is currently Tue Sep 17, 2019 2:46 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:50 pm
Posts: 103
Image

I chose B and the answer sheet says C. Which side are you guys on? :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 12:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:04 pm
Posts: 33
C. increase in size and alternate strips directions


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 12:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2013 9:21 pm
Posts: 75
Definitely C. agree as above


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 12:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2011 12:12 pm
Posts: 386
Yes definitely C


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 1:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 7:32 pm
Posts: 188
I would have said B....

In the same shape size - 1st shape blank, 2nd shape lines one way and 3rd shape lines the other and then start again with increased shape size and blank.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 1:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:50 pm
Posts: 103
Trakka wrote:
I would have said B....

In the same shape size - 1st shape blank, 2nd shape lines one way and 3rd shape lines the other and then start again with increased shape size and blank.


I reasoned the same way you did. I got you on my side then. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 1:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:50 pm
Posts: 103
StackOverFlow wrote:
C. increase in size and alternate strips directions


But if you look at the previous shapes, the size in creases when the colour becomes white. So, what I thought was 1. white 2. slashes 3. backslashes 4. increase the size and then repeat.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 3:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:04 pm
Posts: 33
I can see you are on the pattern of 122,233,344 in terms of size
I work on (1)12233 pattern.

I think you can argue either way, but yours is less obvious than mine :D

That is why I hate NVR, pointless. We will only come back to it in the summer. Too much noise, too distractive.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 6:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:50 pm
Posts: 103
StackOverFlow wrote:
I can see you are on the pattern of 122,233,344 in terms of size
I work on (1)12233 pattern.

I think you can argue either way, but yours is less obvious than mine :D

That is why I hate NVR, pointless. We will only come back to it in the summer. Too much noise, too distractive.


If we code white as 1, slashes as 2 and back slashes as 3, and underline the number when the size increases,
my reasoning would be 3, 1, 2, 3, 1 and you can easily predict 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3...would follow.
and yours would be 3, 1, 2, 3, 1... and the rest is not that easily predicted, I think. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Privacy Policy | Refund Policy | Disclaimer | Copyright © 2004 – 2019