Dan4G wrote:
I can also ask the school if they can add some points around that to support the argument of the score is not the correct reflection of the ability. Would that work?
Whether or not it will work rather depends on your appeal panel, but the more the school can make the arguments for you, the more weight they might carry.
Quote:
What more evidence is required to support the statement?
I can't comment on the forum, but I imagine you're in no position to provide any further proof.
Quote:
Head Teacher’s letter:
1. Line 2: …we all very strongly feel that *** deserves a place at …
Q&As, B41.
Quote:
3. Some more strong arguments from academic achievements and abilities perspective
4. Mention of high achievement in intellectual activities – for example, accelerated learning in music (higher level achievement?)
5. Add some supporting argument for the reasons we want *** to attend CHB (local to us, journey to Aston everyday will be a nightmare for us/*** and consume most of his time which he could use for studies, social and sports activities)
Yes. (Perhaps omit "social".)
Quote:
Year 6 teacher letter:
2. Mock SATs: Please if possible to provide some evidence that *** has scored the highest marks in the class (if he has) or one of the top achievers.
3. Place in the class: Indicate if he is in the top set for Maths, English, etc. or among top performing pupils.
4. Writing skills: How *** is working hard to improve his writing skills by preparing various pieces of writing and if he is achieving his targets.
5. Ability comparison with sibling: As the teacher was sibling’s class teacher earlier as well, perhaps some comparison to show that *** is as bright(er) as his sibling and also to establish a strong sibling connection. It could well be helpful if he mentions that he taught the sibling, and supports our point that the journey to Aston would be a nightmare.
Yes.
Quote:
Year 5 teacher’s letter:
4. Place in the class: Indicate if he is in the top set for Maths, English, etc. or among top performing pupils.
5. If he agrees, please can this be added that he was expected to achieve higher score in 11+
Yes.
They are clearly being very supportive, but I'm afraid they've fallen into the trap of writing a character reference for much of the time (e.g. "role model"). See Q&As, B48:
Quote:
A common mistake is to focus on character and attitude to work. The issue is academic ability .....
..... If oversubscription will also be an issue at appeal, it would help to have some support for why this particular school would be suitable
I'm not suggesting they remove all the nice comments, but there is a risk the important points get lost.
The emphasis needs to be on the things of interest to an appeal panel: outstanding academic ability (rather than attitude to work), any significant extenuating circumstances, and "Why this grammar school?"